Tuesday, February 8, 2011

THE ADVENTURE

The Adventure- an overview
By
B J Ram PGT ENGLISH K V VIKASPURI
It is an unconventional narrative style- an admixture of history and sciencemuddle
and reality.
Prof. Gaitonde, a historian, is going to deliver his 1000th presidential lecture on
the implications of Catastrophe Theory in the Third Battle of Panipat on what
would have been the course of Indian history had Marathas won the battle of
Panipat in 1761. On the way his car collides with a truck and he was unconscious
and disappeared in the thin layer as reported by the truck driver. His body was
passive and mind was actice. But he experiences another world where history is
different from how we know in the real world- in the Third Battle of Panipat, in
reality, Afghans defeated Marathas killing their leader Viswas Rao. But in the
parallel world, Marathas win the war as Viswas Rao escapes narrowly from the
bullet. The victory of Marathas brings about diverse changes and reforms in the
country. He gains consciousness and his friend Rajendra Deshpande rationalizes
his strange experience on the basis of two scientific therories, viz. Catastrophe
Theory and the lack of determinism in Quantum Theory.
The Parallel world
Professor Gaitonde is on his way to Bombay from Pune. It is the pre-independent
Bombay where he finds Anglo-indians and Union Jack. He goes to a library and
reads four volumes of history starting from the period of Asoka upto the Third
Battle of Panipat. The fifth volume of the Book (Bhausahebanchi Bakhar) tells a
different story where Marathas win the war against Afghans in the Third Battle of
Panipat. After their victory India moved towards democracy. Absent mindedly, he
tucks into his pocket a copy of the book. He reaches Azad Maidan where a lecture
is going on. The absence of the chairman for the meeting makes it strange but the
crowd doesn’t want one though the Professor protests. He gets on to the stage,
snatches the mike and starts speaking. The crowd showers eggs and tomatoes
on him and finally throws him out. He is lost in the crowd.
This is where the Professor’s strange experience ends. Next we find him talking
to his friend Rajendra in the real world.
Rajendra’s explanation
Rajendra explains the bizarre experience of the Professor on the basis of two
scientific theories, viz. Catastrophe Theory and the lack of determinism in
Quantum theory.
Catastrophe theory states that a small change in circumstance can bring sudden
shift in behaviour. If we apply this theory to the battle of Panipat, we can find that
there was a crucial moment when the Marathas lost both their leaders-Viswas
Rao and Bhausaheb. So, the Marathas lost their morale and lost the battle. But in
the parallel world Prof. Gaitonde saw the bullet missing Viswas Rao and Marathas
winning the battle. A crucial event gone other way can change the course of
history(the bullet missing/hitting the leader). The Professor produces a torn page
of Bhausahebanchi bakhar from his pocket. This is nothing but the notes he had
prepared for his lecture where he had imagined the fate of the battle to be
otherwise. The bullet hitting Viswas rao was the catastrophic incident in the
battle. The present state of affairs has been reached because of such
catastrophic incidents in history. We can apply this theory to any other battle or
historical incident and see how history takes a different course.
Lack of determinism in Quantum theory
The behaviour of electrons orbiting the nucleus in an atom cannot be predicted.
There are different states of energy-higher and lower. It can make a jump from
high to low energy level and send out a pulse of radiation or a pulse of radiation
can knock it out of state no.2 to state no.1. These states can apply to the world
too. The transitions are common in microscopic systems. If it happened on a
macroscopic level, it could be an interesting food for thought.
Professor Gaitonde made a transition from the world we live in to a parallel world.
One world has the history we know, the other a different history. He neither
traveled to the past nor to the future. He was in the present but experiencing a
different world. At the time of the collision with the truck, he was thinking about
the catastrophe theory and its implications in war. He was probably wondering
about the battle of Panipat. Perhaps the neurons in his brain acted as a trigger.
Like the electron jumping from one state to another, he made a jump from this
world to the parallel world. Any catastrophic situation will provide various
alternatives for us to proceed. But only one can be accepted by us at one time as
we live in a unique world with a unique history. But why did he make such a
transition? An interaction is must for any such transition. The collision and the
thoughts at that moment brought it about.
The incident at Azad maidan is just to show how meetings can be arranged
without chairman unlike in the real world.

No comments:

Post a Comment